[English
Start Page]
[Deutsche
Startseite]
[Email
Feedback] |
(Last modification: 18. May 2010)
Sirtuins: arrangement of pages
Sirtuin Activators Most of this page was extracted from an excellent review: Alcaín and Villalba, 2009). A few references and comments were added.
Notes - Resveratrol is the main topic in another page in this website (more...), and therefore there is no need here to discuss its structure and biosynthesis. - There are many more publications on resveratrol effects found in in vitro studies, and they implicate significant roles in many critical metabolic processes, but here I will focus mostly only on those studies dealing with complete organisms: that is (or probably should be) one of the major concerns for people taking resveratrol, or are planning to do so.
Key results A publication by Howitz et al. (2003) certainly was a key event in the development of the resveratrol story: they studied the capacity of small natural molecules to stimulate sirtuin activities. The screen with recombinant human SIRT1 led to the identification of several molecules, and resveratrol turned to be the most active one. Others, but with lower activity, were another stilbene (piceatannol), two chalcones (butein, isoliquiritigenin), and two flavonols (fisetin, quercetin) (see Fig. 1). The yeast Sir2 recombinant sirtuin was also tested in vitro. Somewhat disappointingly, the effect of resveratrol with yeast Sir2 in vitro was a stimulation of only about twofold, much less than with the human SIRT1 (but our interest is of course in people, not yeast!). These assays measured the deacetylation of acetylated peptides conjugated to a nonphysiological fluorophore. There are good reasons question whether the effects of these natural products were really caused by direct affects on the SIRT1 protein: more.... The in vivo effects with yeast cells looked much better: butein, fisetin, and resveratrol increased average life span by 31%, 55%, and 70%, respectively. Whatever the limitations of these results are, many people were hypnotized by the 70% increase of life span, and quickly started to calculate what resveratrol supplementation could mean to human life extension. Follow-up in the next years demonstrated similar life extension effects by resveratrol in the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) and the nematode Caenorhabiditis elegans (Wood et al., 2004; Viswanathan et al., 2005). However, this was disputed for both organisms in at least two publications (Bass et al., 2007; Pearson et al., 2008). One study even showed that resveratrol extended the lifespan of a fish (Valenzano et al., 2006).
Natural SIRT1 activators, and links to pages in this website (Resveratrol, Quercetin, Isoliquiritigenin = 6'-Deoxychalcone) or in Wikipedia (Piceatannol, Fisetin; both pages are not very informative, however).
The next important advance was the demonstration that resveratrol improved health and survival of mammals (mice) on a high-calorie diet (Baur et al., 2006). The significance is in the term 'high-calorie' diet, and the implications for people: the number of overweight or even obese people is steadily increasing, apparently reaching the staggering number of 2.1 billion world-wide, with a pretty high percentage in the Western countries. This is considered one of the major risk factors for many diseases, e.g. for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and many more; these are often summarized as 'metabolic syndrome'. The study showed that resveratrol prevented the effects of excess calorie intake, that it shifted the physiology towards the state of mice on a standard diet, and that it led to a significant increase of survival. Comparable conclusions on the effects of resveratrol were reached by Lagouge et al., 2006. One of the often discussed concerns about these experiments is the resveratrol dosis: to the layman it looks awfully high in the Baur et al. (2006) experiments, but laymen are often not aware of the fact that amounts per mice kilogram cannot simply be extrapolated to humans (more...). More recent work (Barger et al., 2008a) indicated that much lower concentrations of resveratrol are likely to be sufficient to obtain many of the beneficial effects, and that even short-term consumption can mimic at least partially the effects of a long-term calorie restricted diet (Barger et al., 2008b). The application of resveratrol (or other substances with even higher activity, see below) for treating the many problems of the metabolic syndrome was one of the central themes in many recent studies (see Alcain and Villalba, 2009 for a more detailed discussion, citation at end of this page). In this context, these authors state that 'modifying the dietary habits of populations will be extremely difficult'. It is therefore probably only realistic (although certainly not the optimal solution) to look for dietary supplements that mimic the effects of a low calorie diet. Clinical studies on the effects of resveratrol on type 2 diabetes and other diseases are supposed to be completed soon (November 2009). The review cited above also gives information on some companies, their resveratrol preparations (e.g. SRT501, Longevinex, Resvida), and numbers of the patents.
There are a few concerns with the application of resveratrol to humans
See also a comment in the general page on Sirtuins: more... , and remarks in the page on sirtuin inhibitors (more...)
The poor bioavailability of resveratrol, its rapid metabolization, and its capacity to interact with multiple targets are not properties desirable in a drug ('dirty' molecules for the pharmaceutical companies). Therefore it is of considerable interest to find other molecules with the same effect, but higher bioavailabiltiy, specificity, and potency. Several companies looked for that. One found several quinoxaline derivatives havíng such effects (Nayagam et al. 2006), but I will not go into detail here, because there are apparently no detailed studies in animals yet. Another company (Sirtris Pharmaceuticals) is apparently much further. The screening identified a number of promising compounds (Milne et al., 2007), and some of them are shown in Fig. 2. In particular SRT1720 appeared to be 1000-fold more active than SRT501 (the resveratrol formulation of the company) in in vitro assays, and the experiments with mice also were quite successful. Recent work (Feige et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2009) demonstrated that not only resveratrol, but also SRT1720 produced effects like calorie restricted diets. Modifications of the backbone were also tested (Vu et al., 2009), and novel SRT1 activators were published (Fig. 3) (Bemis et al., 2009). Human trials are apparently already under way (October 2009), and it will be exciting to see the outcome.
Synthetic SIRT1 activators.
Recently published novel SIRT1 activators (Bemis et al., 2009)
Conclusions
The source for most of the information summarized in this page
File History:
. |
|
|