Websites of the Schröder Group

Level up                                              
 

[English Start Page]                                                                    [Deutsche Startseite]                                          [Email Feedback]   
Indexes:   [All Pages]   [Type III PKS]   [Catharanthus roseus]       Inhaltsverzeichnisse:  [Alle Seiten]   [Typ III PKS]  [Catharanthus roseus]


(Last modification: 22. November 2009)

 

Sirtuins: arrangement of pages


 

Sirtuin Inhibitors

 

Note:

    Most of this page was extracted from an excellent review: Alcaín and Villalba, 2009); a few more recent references were added. See also the review by Grubisha et al., 2005.

Note: If the inhibition of sirtuin activities in vitro was measured with fluorescent substrates, the validity of the results can be questioned, as discussed with the sirtuin activators: more...

 

Introductory remarks

 

    After all we have seen about the beneficial effects of Sirtuin activation (more...): why should somebody be interested in the opposite effect, i.e. blocking all the good things caused by resveratrol and other activators? However, as usually, the matter is not that simple, and sirtuin activation could have some effects that are not desirable. To understand that, we'll have to look at some of the properties of sirtuins (this is a selection; there are certainly more examples!). The focus here is on human SIRT1 and SIRT2, because they appear to be the preferred targets for activators and inhibitors, and many affect both. Have a look at the conclusions if you do not want to go through the details: more...

  • SIRT1
       Apart from all the beneficial effects, SIRT1 activation has at least one property with a Janus head, i.e. it can be good or bad. That is the SIRT1 catalyzed deacetylation of the tumour suppressor protein p53 (Vaziri et al., 2001) that leads to inactivation of p53. That is good for normal cells because it increases their survival and prolongs life span, but it is not so desirable for tumorous cells because it has there the same effect: it might stimulate the survival and replication of tumour cells. Actually, SIRT1 appears to be up-regulated in most cancer cells, e.g. in human lung cancer, prostate cancer, leukaemia, in cancer cell lines, and in tissue samples from colon carcinoma (reviewed in Ashraf et al., 2006; Lim, 2006; Stünkel et al., 2007; Fraga and Esteller, 2007; Jung-Hynes et al., 2009). Re-activating p53, i.e. inhibiting SIRT1 instead of stimulating it, could trigger strong apoptosis in tumour cells, and thus could eliminate tumours.

  • SIRT2
       This protein is predominantly in the cytoplasm, with highest expression in the brain; it co-localizes with microtubules, deacetylates tubulin (North et al., 2003), and plays a role in the cell cycle (Inoue et al., 2007). It is noteworthy that p53 and histones H3 and H4 are additional substrates of SIRT2, suggesting a broader role (Heltweg et al., 2006), and thus SIRT2 activation could potentially as undesirable as SIRT1 activation. On the other hand, SIRT2 also deacetylates the transcription regulator FOXO3a (Wang et al., 2007), activating it, and in consequence promotes cell death under severe stress. By that function SIRT2 it is a potential tumour suppressor, and it is actually severely reduced in a large number of brain tumour cell lines (Voelter-Mahlknecht et al., 2005). Again, there may be good or bad effects by changing the activity of SIRT2. See also the interesting articles by Garske et al., 2007, and Jing et al., 2007 which among other things deal with the complexity of SIRT2 functions.

Return to top


 

The following is a brief discussion of some inhibitors

Note: the list might not be up to date, and there many more references for most of the inhibitors discussed here; only a selection is cited.

The structures of the molecules are shown in Fig. 1

  • Splitomycin and Derivatives
    They were discovered in a screen for inhibitors of yeast Sir2 (Bedalov et al., 2001; Hirao et al., 2003; Posakony et al., 2004), but it was not very efficient with human sirtuins. A  series of more potent derivatives were developed; some of them were quite effective, revealing a correlation between increased SIRT1 enzyme inhibition and anticancer activity (Neugebauer et al., 2008). HR73 is one of the effective derivatives with inhibitory activity for SIRT1. This inhibition of SIRT1 deacetylase inhibits Tat deacetylation (Trans-Activator of Transcription), a protein that in its deacetylated form leads to an enormous increase in the transcription of all genes in the integrated HIV provirus. Thus, SIRT1 deacetylase inhibitors could be a factor in treating immunodeficiency virus infections (Pagans et al., 2005). Later work, however, reached different conclusions: it reported that activation of SIRT1, for example by resveratrol, inhibited Tat-induced HIV-1 transactivation (Zhang et al., 2009a, 2009b). If anything, this shows that the situation is likely to be more complex than thought before, and that the use of different model systems can lead to conflicting results.

  • Sirtinol
    This drug inhibits yeast Sir2 and human SIRT2 activity in vitro, it is probably a general inhibitor of Sirtuin deacetylase activities. Apparently the 2-hydroxy-1-naphtol part (blue in Fig. 1) was sufficient, and these substances represent a new class of inhibitors (Grozinger et al., 2001). A growth-arresting effect of sirtinol has been shown with human breast and lung cancer cells (Ota et al., 2005), also with prostata cancer cells (Jung-Hynes et al., 2009), and it had a protecting effect on antigen-induced airway inflammation and hyper-responsiveness (Kim et al., 2009). Furthermore it protected to some extent against certain muscular dystrophies (Catoire et al., 2008). Even more powerful analogues were developed (Mai et al., 2005). As noted above, SIRT1 is up-regulated in most cancer cells (see above), and thus such inhibitors could be useful. Another unexpected use could be the prevention or treatment of leishmaniasis, especially in immunodepressed patients (Vergnes et al., 2005; Tavares et al., 2008).
    A side line for sirtuins in plants: The experiments of Grozinger et al. (2001) also investigated the effects of sirtinol on the development of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. This appeared interesting because plants do contain proteins related to sirtuins (Pandey et al., 2002), and it was an attractive possibility that they had similar functions. The results with seedlings of Arabidopsis indeed revealed some auxin-like effects of sirtinol, suggesting a possibility that sirtuins may be involved in some aspect of auxin action/control. However, later studies showed that the sirtinol action in plants most likely had nothing to do with sirtuins: careful investigations showed that the sirtinol was degraded in plants to
    2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde and 2-hydroxy-1-naphthoic acid, which are auxin-analogues and induce auxin-controlled developments (Dai et al., 2005).

  • AGK2
    The application of this SIRT2 inhibitor showed, at least in an cellular and in a Drosophila model, amelioration of the formation of alpha-synuclein fibrils that are characteristic for neurodegenerative diseases, e.g. Parkinson's disease (Outeiro et al., 2007). AGK2 has also been used as sirtuin inhibitor in more recent experiments (Giammona et al., 2009).

  • Tenovin
    Lain et al. (2008) screened 30,000 small molecules for p53-activating activity, and found two compounds that turned out to be SIRT1 inhibitors. They decreased tumour growth in vitro at micromolar concentrations, and delayed tumour growth in vivo as single agents, with tenovin-6 a bit more effective. See also the comments by Brooks and Gu (2008).

  • Gambinol
    Heltweg et al. (2006) identified and characterized this interesting compound which shares a ß-napthol pharmacore with Sirtinol, Splitomycin, HR73, and Salermide (also in Fig. 1, and described in the next para). It inhibited human SIRT1 and SIRT2 deacetylase activity, and was most active with Burkitt lymphoma cell lines. Recent work described modifications leading to higher potency and modified selectivity (Medda et al., 2009).

  • Salermide
    This drug was described only recently (Lara et al., 2009). It was an efficient inhibitor of SIRT1 and SIRT2 in vitro, in much lower concentrations than sirtinol, and it was well tolerated by mice in concentrations up to 0.1 mM. Salermide induced apoptosis in cancer, but not in normal cells. Interestingly, the effect was independent of p53. Instead, it was a consequence of SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of K16H4 (= Lysine 16 in Histone 4), which apparently led to a re-activation of proapoptotic genes repressed exclusively in cancer cells.

Fig. 1.

Structures of some Sirtuin inhibitors.
Blue
: the 2-hydroxy-1-naphtol part common to several inhibitors.
Adapted from Alcain and Villalba, 2009, with modifications.

Structures of some Sirtuin inhibitors

 

   'This short overview does not cover all described inhibitors, for example the Thiobarbiturates and some others (see Alcain and Villalba, 2009, refererence given below) for the details.

 

Conclusion:
   I admit that I was a bit shocked after looking at these publications because I was not aware of the aspect that SIRT activators might have a positive effect on cancer or tumourous growth. Most of the literature on resveratrol deals with its benefits.

   The paper by Jang et al. (1997) on the cancer chemopreventive activity of resveratrol was certainly one of the major triggers. This was followed by a flurry of optimistic publications, including a few years later the identification of sirtuins as major targets of resveratrol. At first sight, it seems that the publications reporting on the possible benefits rarely mention or know about the possible side effects, or possibly do not take that seriously.

   Regardless of that, my advice would be: if you are thinking about taking resveratrol regularly, it would be good to talk to your Doctor about that (taking for granted that he is up to date with the recent literature).

   I think this would be highly advisable if one has a family history of cancer/tumours in the family. Or if you happen to be not so young anymore: who can be sure that one does not have some degenerated cells in his body?

 

See also a comment in the page on Sirtuins (more...) a look at possible concerns with the human use of resveratrol (more...)

Return to top


 

Reference

  • Alcain, F. J., Villalba, J. M., 2009b. Sirtuin inhibitors. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 19, 283-294.
    BACKGROUND: The sirtuin family of deacetylase enzymes comprises seven proteins (SIRT1-7) that are dependent on NAD+ for their activity. Three proteins are located in the nucleus, three in the mitochondria and only one is predominantly cytoplasmic. Caloric restriction and oxidative stress generally up-regulate their expression. SIRT1, the orthologue of yeast Sir2, is the mammalian sirtuin that has been most extensively studied to date. Among other targets, SIRT1 down-regulates the activity of the nuclear transcription factor p53, being this related with an increase in lifespan and cell survival associated to stress resistance.
    OBJECTIVE: Because sirtuin modulation could have beneficial effects on several human diseases, there is a growing interest in the discovery and development of small molecules that modify its activity. This review will be focused on sirtuin inhibitors.
    CONCLUSIONS
    : Several specific inhibitors of SIRT1 have been described. These compounds could be mainly useful for the treatment of cancers by increasing p53 activity that stops the formation of tumours and induces apoptosis. A p53-independent massive induction of apoptosis has been also described for one inhibitor. In addition, a potent and selective SIRT2 inhibitor that ameliorates the alpha-synuclein fibril formation in Parkinson disease has been proposed to treat this kind of neurodegenerative disease.

Return to top


File History:

  • 22.11.2009: Update on a few links, and sirtinol action in plants: more...

  • 20.11.2009: Update on a few more references

  • 03.11.2009: Design of page

.