[English
Start Page]
[Deutsche
Startseite]
[Email
Feedback] |
(Last modification: 25. October 2010)
Sirtuins: arrangement of pages
Sirtuins Overview: Structure, Enzyme Activities, Functions Note: most of this was extracted from three excellent reviews: Michan and Sinclair (2007), Alcaín and Villalba (2009a, 2009b); a few up to date citations were added.
The number of publications on sirtuins is huge, and seems to increase daily. It would therefore be futile to attempt here a comprehensive review of the literature. The reviews cited above (all recent) do an excellent job of that, although some of that might already be outdated even at the time of writing this page (November 2009). The summary given here will not cover the pysiological roles of sirtuins; that should be the privilege of the specialists in the field. I will simply give an overview of the proteins in humans, the enzyme reactions, and I will briefly dwell on the role of sirtuins in the benefits of calorie restricted diets. Sirtuins were first described in yeast, under various names, and even the early results showed already that the proteins had important functions in metabolism, cell cycle and mating in these 'simple' organisms. The protein discovered first was named Sir2, the abbreviation of 'silent information regulator'. Later studies showed that Sir2 is a member of large family of proteins that occur in all organisms, that is, not only in fungi, but also in bacteria, animals, and plants (Frye, 2000). The members of this large and ancient protein family are now called 'sirtuins'. The human sirtuins have attracted considerable interest because of the immense importance of sirtuins for health and longevity that emerged in the last few years. I will attempt to give a very simple overview of these proteins and their enzymatic activities in humans. A few important points are summarized in Table 1.
Human Sirtuins (SIRT): overview of proteins, size, isoforms, enzyme functions, and localization. [Basic design from Michan and Sinclair (2007), modified].
Humans contain seven different sirtuins. All share a conserved catalytic core domain of about 275 amino acids, but otherwise they can be rather different in size. If you check up in the databases, the situation is not as simple as described in some reviews: several of the genes can express different protein isoforms, resulting from the use of alternative start codons (SIRT1, SIRT2) or from alternative splicing (SIRT3, SIRT5). The Table contains links to the protein sequences if you want to look directly at the protein files; the data files also contain additional citations that might be interesting to look at. Importantly, the cellular localizations are very different: Some are in the nucleus, one may be in both nucleus and cytoplasm (SIRT1), one is mostly in the cytoplasm, but has also been found in the nucleus (SIRT2), and three appear to be exclusively in mitochondria. However, such a strict division should be taken with caution because the distribution may be variable in different tissues/cell types. The enzyme functions are also rather interesting: the proteins are either deacetylases (DAC) or mono-ADP-ribosyl transferases (ART) or both. Both are strictly dependent on NAD+ .The reactions are summarized in the scheme below (Fig. 1). Apparently the enzyme activities of SIRT7 in vitro are not clear, although it definitely has functions in vivo. It is noteworthy that most of the studies looking at the physiological roles consider only the DAC activity, and in some reviews the human sirtuins are simply summarized as deacetylases.
Enzyme activities of human sirtuins.
These proteins have either deacetylase (DAC) or
mono-ADP-ribosyl transferases
(ART) activities or both. Both reactions are strictly dependent on
NAD+.
It is not quite clear whether the ART activities are really enzymatic:
more...
What is so interesting about these reactions, apart from the unusual biochemistry? It has to do with the fact that they have to do with important regulations in the organisms, and probably the most important are those having to do with health and longevity. At least one of these aspects should be summarized here, without claim of being complete or up to date.
Beneficial effects of calorie restriction: Sirtuins may play a decisive role Calorie restriction, i.e. a diet in which an organism receives about 20% (or even 40%) fewer calories than it would consume if given free reign, is the only non-genetic method that is proven to increase the lifespan in all organisms tested: it was demonstrated with Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) (Jiang et al., 2000), Fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) (Mair et al., 2003; Grandison et al., 2009), Nematodes (Caenorhabditis elegans) (Lakowski and Hekimi, 1998), Crustaceae (Daphnia longispina) (Ingle et al., 1937), Spiders (Frontinella pyramitela) (Austad, 1989), und Mice (Weindruch and Walford, 1982). Okay, mice are not humans, but recent results demonstrate that this is also true for rhesus monkeys (Colman et al., 2009; Rezzi et al., 2009), and these are evolutionary not so far away from humans that one would expect basis differences in these mechanisms. These results suggest that the mechanism might be very old, well conserved, and similar in all organisms. However, other reports claim that the effect of calorie restriction is not universal, but species-specific (Mockett et al., 2006), and they cite the house-fly (Musca domestica) as example that it did not extend lifespan in this species (Cooper et al., 2004). A recent study investigated the consequences of calorie restriction in male mice on a much broader level, by analysis of microarray expression data (Estep et al., 2009). The results showed that calorie restriction significantly changed the expression of over 3,000 genes, many between 10- and 50-fold. A general conclusion was that the life-extension effect in males might arise partly from a shift of gene expression to those patterns typical for females which live longer anyway than males (I wonder how readily some people will do what is standard: apply the conclusions to humans?). A few recent reviews on calorie restriction and aging are here: more... A role for sirtuins was shown first in yeast (Kaeberlein et al., 1999; Lin et al., 2000; Anderson et al., 2003). Essentially the same results were also reported for metazoans. For example, Caenorhabditis elegans (a model organism for developmental studies: Wikipedia) with a chromosome duplication containing a second copy of sir-2.1 (the worm sirtuin most similar to the yeast sir2), lived up to 50% longer than the worms not containing this duplication (Tissenbaum and Guarente, 2001; Wang and Tissenbaum, 2006). The same was demonstrated for Drosophila (Rogina and Helfand, 2004), and there is evidence that this is also true for mammals (see e.g. Cohen et al., 2004; Bordone et al., 2007; Pfluger et al., 2008). It should be pointed out, however, that not all scientists agree with the idea that sirtuin functions are always beneficial: they argue, and there is evidence for it, that sirtuins can play both protective and pro-aging roles: reviewed in Longo, 2009. See also these pages: Sirtuin Activators and Sirtuin Inhibitors.
I would like to add a quote from a commentary paper that was published end of 2008 (Kaeberlein, 2008), with permission of the author: So what’s the ‘‘take-home message’’ from all this? Is more SirT1 good, or is less SirT1 good? The answer, as is often the case in biology, is that there’s no simple answer. Activating SirT1 is probably a good thing in some cells under some conditions and is probably a bad thing in other cells under other conditions. SirT1 activators may be good for diabetes but may cause cancer due to p53 inhibition, SirT1 inhibitors may protect against cancer but cause metabolic disease, and there is evidence supporting the idea that both activators and inhibitors of SirT1 can confer protection against neurodegeneration in different contexts. The one thing that seems clear is that sirtuin activators are unlikely to be a ‘‘magic bullet’’ for aging. A more realistic hope is that, as we continue to unravel the complexities of sirtuin biology, targeted activation or inhibition of SirT1—and perhaps other sirtuins as well—will prove therapeutically useful toward a subset of age-associated diseases. Such an achievement would be a huge step forward in the transition of aging-related science from the laboratory to the clinic, and we eagerly await the next chapter in the unfolding saga that is sirtuin biology. Have a look at comments in the pages on Sirtuin Activators (more...) and Sirtuin Inhibitors (more...)
Have a look at these pages:
Note to ADP-ribosylation (ART) activities
These activities of the sirtuins appears to be a
bit of an enigma. For example with the yeast Sir2, the sirtuin prototype: the
first reported activity was indeed that of ART (Tanny
et al., 1999), long before the discovery of the biologically relevant deacetylase
(DAC) activity. The same apparently happened with the mammalian SIRT6: it was
first described as ART, without detectable DAC activity
with standard substrates (Liszt
et al., 2005),
and it was identified only recently as DAC with a very specific substrate,
lysine 9 in histone H3
(Michishita
et al., 2008;
Kawahara
et al., 2009). Whatever the final conclusion may be: ADP-ribosylation has been known for a long time: more..., and it will be very important to know whether the ART activities of the sirtuins are truly enzymatic and happen in vivo, and if so, whether they have any physiological importance. This information will also be very important if one plans to influence sirtuin activities, e.g. by Sirtuin Activators and Sirtuin Inhibitors.
A common intermediate can explain the different activities of sirtuins. The key intermediate is an imidate (boxed orange). It can be processed into different products, depending on the attacking nucleophiles: a) deacetylation (boxed black): this is the major reaction in presence of the correct acetylated substrate, under these conditions b) and c) play no significant role; b) ADP-ribosylation and c) liberation of ADP-ribose: these pathways are always minor in terms of absolute rates, but they can increase if the deacetylation is blocked in any way, e.g. the absence of the right substrate. However, the absolute rates seem to be always very small, when compared with the DAC activity. See Du et al. (2009) for a more detailed discussion; the scheme shown here is a modified, simplified version of Fig. 9 in that publication.
References for the reviews cited on top of the page
A few recent reviews or articles on calorie restriction and aging
The Editorial Board of Aging reviews research papers published in 2009, which they believe have or will have significant impact on aging research. Among many others, the topics include genes that accelerate aging or in contrast promote longevity in model organisms, DNA damage responses and telomeres, molecular mechanisms of life span extension by calorie restriction and pharmacological interventions into aging. The emerging message in 2009 is that aging is not random but determined by a genetically-regulated longevity network and can be decelerated both genetically and pharmacologically. Fontana, L., Partridge, L., Longo, V. D. When the food intake of organisms such as yeast and rodents is reduced (dietary restriction), they live longer than organisms fed a normal diet. A similar effect is seen when the activity of nutrient-sensing pathways is reduced by mutations or chemical inhibitors. In rodents, both dietary restriction and decreased nutrient-sensing pathway activity can lower the incidence of age-related loss of function and disease, including tumors and neurodegeneration. Dietary restriction also increases life span and protects against diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease in rhesus monkeys, and in humans it causes changes that protect against these age-related pathologies. Tumors and diabetes are also uncommon in humans with mutations in the growth hormone receptor, and natural genetic variants in nutrient-sensing pathways are associated with increased human life span. Dietary restriction and reduced activity of nutrient-sensing pathways may thus slow aging by similar mechanisms, which have been conserved during evolution. We discuss these findings and their potential application to prevention of age-related disease and promotion of healthy aging in humans, and the challenge of possible negative side effects. Baur, J.
A., Chen, D., Chini, E. N., Chua, K., Cohen, H. Y., De Cabo, R., Deng, C.,
Dimmeler, S., Gius, D., Guarente, L. P., Helfand, S. L., Imai, S., Itoh, H.,
Kadowaki, T., Koya, D., Leeuwenburgh, C., McBurney, M., Nabeshima, Y., Neri,
C., Oberdoerffer, P., Pestell, R. G., Rogina, B., Sadoshima, J., Sartorelli,
V., Serrano, M., Sinclair, D. A., Steegborn, C., Tatar, M., Tissenbaum, H.
A., Tong, Q., Tsubota, K., Vaquero, A., Verdin, E., 2010. Dietary
restriction: standing up for sirtuins. Science 329, 1012-1013. Burtner, C. R., Murakami, C. J., Kennedy, B. K., Kaeberlein, M. The molecular mechanisms that cause organismal aging are a topic of intense scrutiny and debate. Dietary restriction extends the life span of many organisms, including yeast, and efforts are underway to understand the biochemical and genetic pathways that regulate this life span extension in model organisms. Here we describe the mechanism by which dietary restriction extends yeast chronological life span, defined as the length of time stationary yeast cells remain viable in a quiescent state. We find that aging under standard culture conditions is the result of a cell-extrinsic component that is linked to the pH of the culture medium. We identify acetic acid as a cell-extrinsic mediator of cell death during chronological aging, and demonstrate that dietary restriction, growth in a non-fermentable carbon source, or transferring cells to water increases chronological life span by reducing or eliminating extracellular acetic acid. Other life span extending environmental and genetic interventions, such as growth in high osmolarity media, deletion of SCH9 or RAS2, increase cellular resistance to acetic acid. We conclude that acetic acid induced mortality is the primary mechanism of chronological aging in yeast under standard conditions Colman, R. J., Anderson, R. M., Johnson, S. C., Kastman, E. K., Kosmatka, K. J., Beasley, T. M., Allison, D. B., Cruzen, C., Simmons, H. A., Kemnitz, J. W., Weindruch, R. Caloric restriction (CR), without malnutrition, delays aging and extends life span in diverse species; however, its effect on resistance to illness and mortality in primates has not been clearly established. We report findings of a 20-year longitudinal adult-onset CR study in rhesus monkeys aimed at filling this critical gap in aging research. In a population of rhesus macaques maintained at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, moderate CR lowered the incidence of aging-related deaths. At the time point reported, 50% of control fed animals survived as compared with 80% of the CR animals. Furthermore, CR delayed the onset of age-associated pathologies. Specifically, CR reduced the incidence of diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and brain atrophy. These data demonstrate that CR slows aging in a primate species. Estep, P. W., III, Warner, J. B., Bulyk, M. L. BACKGROUND: Calorie restriction (CR) is the only intervention known to extend lifespan in a wide range of organisms, including mammals. However, the mechanisms by which it regulates mammalian aging remain largely unknown, and the involvement of the TOR and sirtuin pathways (which regulate aging in simpler organisms) remain controversial. Additionally, females of most mammals appear to live longer than males within species; and, although it remains unclear whether this holds true for mice, the relationship between sex-biased and CR-induced gene expression remains largely unexplored. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We generated microarray gene expression data from livers of male mice fed high calorie or CR diets, and we find that CR significantly changes the expression of over 3,000 genes, many between 10- and 50-fold. We compare our data to the GenAge database of known aging-related genes and to prior microarray expression data of genes expressed differently between male and female mice. CR generally feminizes gene expression and many of the most significantly changed individual genes are involved in aging, hormone signaling, and p53-associated regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis. Among the genes showing the largest and most statistically significant CR-induced expression differences are Ddit4, a key regulator of the TOR pathway, and Nnmt, a regulator of lifespan linked to the sirtuin pathway. Using western analysis we confirmed post-translational inhibition of the TOR pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that CR induces widespread gene expression changes and acts through highly evolutionarily conserved pathways, from microorganisms to mammals, and that its life-extension effects might arise partly from a shift toward a gene expression profile more typical of females.
Visits since November 7, 2009 File History:
. |
|
|